LONDON (AFP) - Albert Einstein described belief in God as "childish superstition" and said Jews were not the chosen people, in a letter to be sold in London this week, an auctioneer said Tuesday.

The father of relativity, whose previously known views on religion have been more ambivalent and fuelled much discussion, made the comments in response to a philosopher in 1954.

As a Jew himself, Einstein said he had a great affinity with Jewish people but said they "have no different quality for me than all other people".

"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.

"No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this," he wrote in the letter written on January 3, 1954 to the philosopher Eric Gutkind, cited by The Guardian newspaper.

The German-language letter is being sold Thursday by Bloomsbury Auctions in Mayfair after being in a private collection for more than 50 years, said the auction house's managing director Rupert Powell.

In it, the renowned scientist, who declined an invitation to become Israel's second president, rejected the idea that the Jews are God's chosen people.

"For me the Jewish religion like all others is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions," he said.

"And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people."

And he added: "As far as my experience goes, they are no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them."

Previously the great scientist's comments on religion -- such as "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" -- have been the subject of much debate, used notably to back up arguments in favour of faith.

Powell said the letter being sold this week gave a clear reflection of Einstein's real thoughts on the subject. "He's fairly unequivocal as to what he's saying. There's no beating about the bush," he told AFP.

felonisssalt wrote on May 15, edited on May 15
"Powell said the letter being sold this week gave a clear reflection of Einstein's real thoughts on the subject. 'He's fairly unequivocal as to what he's saying. There's no beating about the bush,' he told AFP."

No, but there IS some beating around The Bush and other nitwits of like ilk.
theophilusbong wrote on May 15
"His position on God has been widely misrepresented by people on both sides of the atheism/religion divide but he always resisted easy stereotyping on the subject.

"Like other great scientists he does not fit the boxes in which popular polemicists like to pigeonhole him," said Brooke. "It is clear for example that he had respect for the religious values enshrined within Judaic and Christian traditions ... but what he understood by religion was something far more subtle than what is usually meant by the word in popular discussion."

Despite his categorical rejection of conventional religion, Brooke said that Einstein became angry when his views were appropriated by evangelists for atheism. He was offended by their lack of humility and once wrote. "The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility.""

-http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion
felonisssalt wrote on May 15
Perhaps you should have written, "...Einstein became angry when his views were appropriated by THOSE FEW evangelists for atheism."

Few atheists are "evangelistic" or anti-mystery, although most of us would prefer to not be disadvantaged by the "lack of evidence" crew.
theophilusbong wrote on May 15
Perhaps you should have written, "...Einstein became angry when his views were appropriated by THOSE FEW evangelists for atheism."

Few atheists are "evangelistic" or anti-mystery, although most of us would prefer to not be disadvantaged by the "lack of evidence" crew.
Not my words, I don't see why I have to change it nor think that I should.
felonisssalt wrote on May 15
I wrote "perhaps". Just to make it more accurate.
theophilusbong wrote on May 15
Ok. I understand your sentiment but I am just re-quoting an article to balance this post. :)

Add a Comment
   
© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help